#UPDATE MY BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT UPDATE#
#UPDATE MY BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT CODE#

#UPDATE MY BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT CODE#

This brings us to one of the fundamental rules when working with Git in this manner: Making these kinds of changes in your local repository to code you haven't pushed yet is fine. This is because the Git workflow works well for picking up additional commits at the end of a branch, but it can be challenging if a set of commits is no longer seen in the chain when someone resets the branch pointer back.

Why would you choose to do a revert over a reset operation? If you have already pushed your chain of commits to the remote repository (where others may have pulled your code and started working with it), a revert is a nicer way to cancel out changes for them. This can be done with a git revert command, such as: $ git revert HEADīecause this adds a new commit, Git will prompt for the commit message: If we add a line to a file in each commit in the chain, one way to get back to the version with only two lines is to reset to that commit, i.e., git reset HEAD~1.Īnother way to end up with the two-line version is to add a new commit that has the third line removed-effectively canceling out that change. The effect is most easily seen by looking at Figure 1 again. Where the reset command moves the branch pointer back in the chain (typically) to 'undo' changes, the revert command adds a new commit at the end of the chain to 'cancel' changes. The net effect of the git revert command is similar to reset, but its approach is different. Before you use the hard option, be sure that's what you really want to do, since the command overwrites any uncommitted changes. In effect, it resets (clears out) the staging area and overwrites content in the working directory with the content from the commit you reset to. This overwrites any local changes you haven't committed. Using these options can be useful in targeted circumstances such as git reset -hard . These options include: hard to reset the commit being pointed to in the repository, populate the working directory with the contents of the commit, and reset the staging area soft to only reset the pointer in the repository and mixed (the default) to reset the pointer and the staging area.

#UPDATE MY BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT UPDATE#

The git reset command also includes options to update the other parts of your local environment with the contents of the commit where you end up. Moreover, the git log command shows no new commit on master. For example, the removed file Readme.md has come back. Next, let's switch back to the master branch and check if it's unmodified: $ git switch masterĪs we've seen, on the master branch, all changes to the working tree files we made previously have been restored. Then, we've committed the changes to the feature2 branch. Further, all uncommitted changes have been moved from master to the feature2 branch. & git commit -m 'feature2 is done'ġ file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)Īs we can see in the output above, git switch -C creates a new branch feature2 and brings us to feature2. Next, let's use the git switch command to move these uncommitted changes to a new branch called feature2: $ git switch -C feature2 This time, we've removed the file Readme.md and added a new ReadmeNew.md file. Next, let's do the same test as git checkout -b on the myRepo project: $ git branchĪs we can see in the output above, we're currently on the master branch. It works pretty much the same as the git checkout -b command. Moreover, we can use the -C option to create a new branch and switch to it in one shot. As its name implies, git switch allows us to switch between branches. Therefore, Git has introduced the git switch command since version 2.23 to clear some of the confusion from the checkout command's overloaded usage. The usage of the checkout command is pretty overloaded. The same command can do many different kinds of operations, such as restoring the working tree files, switching branches, creating branches, moving the head, and so on. Further, there is no new commit on master, either.Īs we've known, Git's checkout command is like a Swiss Army knife. There is no local change on the master branch, as we can see in the output. Now, let's switch back to the master branch and check if we've left it unchanged: $ git checkout master Next, let's stage and commit the changes: $ git add. No changes added to commit (use 'git add' and/or 'git commit -a')Īs the commands above show, we've created the feature1 branch and moved all uncommitted changes from master to feature1.

' to discard changes in working directory) Next, let's test the git checkout command on our myRepo project: $ git branch Moreover, this command will leave the current branch as it is and bring all uncommitted changes to the new branch. The git checkout -b command will create a new branch and switch to it.

Update my branch with master git